Colossian Blog
November 9, 2011 | Andy Saur

Article – What I Would Like to Hear an Evolutionary Creationist Say

Article – What I Would Like to Hear an Evolutionary Creationist Say

By Todd Charles Wood
November 9th, 2011     

***See the companion article: “What I Would Like To Hear A Young-Earth Creationist Say” by Dennis Venema

If the world is supposed to know we are Christians because of our love for each other, then they’d never guess it when we talk about science and evolution.  I’ve been involved in this debate for almost my entire adult life, and I’ve seen a lot of disheartening behavior that is anything but loving.  As a young person I joined right in on the culture war, but as I’ve matured it seems either the debate has gotten more rancorous or I’ve just grown weary of the fighting.  Maybe it’s a little of both.  Whatever the reason, I’ve become interested in the past few years in ways of breaking the deadlock between the various factions in the war.  The challenge is how to do this?

Then out of the blue, I was invited to contribute something to the Colossian Forum, which I’d never heard of.  As I browsed their website, I sympathized with their stated goals, but my battle weariness made me suspicious of them.  When they suggested I write an essay on “What I would like to hear a theistic evolutionist say,” I couldn’t resist, because I knew exactly what I wanted to hear.  It’s the same thing I want to hear all sides of the debate confess.  It’s what I keep telling my students.  I suspect it might be the key to breaking the deadlock.

I don’t know.

You see, when I look across the battlefield, there’s one thing I see time and time again: Everyone acts as though their position is the only permissible one.  Everyone thinks they’ve got the right theological answers, and everyone thinks they’ve got the right scientific answers.  And of course, each side claims that they’ve got the only rational position.  But is this really true?

When I read over books and articles written by Christians who accept evolution, I notice two important trends.  One trend is the assurance that the scientific debate is settled and certain and more importantly that there is no contradiction between evolution and Christian theology.  This trend reflects that desire to have the answers and to put the best arguments forward.  The second trend is more subtle, and it’s unlikely to be noticed by reading a single author.  Let’s call the second trend theological disparity.

From this outsider’s perspective, it seems like there really is no unified theological position that all evolutionary creationists agree on.  In fact, they don’t even agree on what to call themselves.  Some prefer the newer “evolutionary creationist,” in order to emphasize their belief in God as a Creator God.  Others dislike the connotations of “creationist” and prefer the older term “theistic evolutionist.”  And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Can an evolutionary creationist (or theistic evolutionist, if you prefer) accept a literal Adam and Eve?  If so, how?  Was there a real fall from some perfect state?  If so, how did the fall work?  If not, what does it mean for redemption, both in this life and the one to come?  Tinkering around with the meaning of redemption then strikes at the core of Christianity.  Why did Jesus have to die?  What is the meaning of His resurrection?

Now it’s true that there are answers to all these questions.  Theistic evolutionists don’t shy away from hard questions, but the key point is that there is no agreed-upon answer to any of them.  One person insists that Adam and Eve and a real fall from perfection are not negotiable.  Another wants to keep Adam and Eve but is willing to rethink what the origin of sin might be.  Another thinks that Adam and Eve can be purely symbolic, but still thinks that the fall is real.  Most conservatives in the debate approach the issue of redemption with great care, but there are plenty of others who are quite willing to “reimagine” what Christ’s death and resurrection were all about.

Yet, despite this theological disparity, we are assured that there is no contradiction between Christian theology and evolution.  Call me crazy, but don’t you think if evolution and Christianity were so obviously and easily compatible, there might be a bit more unanimity on how that compatibility actually works?  Am I expecting too much?  Perhaps when people ask if Christian theology is compatible with evolution, the first answer should be, “I don’t know.”

To be fair, what I’ve just written could also be said about young-age creationists and science.  If it’s true that evolution is so obviously wrong and all the evidence supports creationism, why is there such a fight within creationism over cosmogony, Flood geology, created kinds, and speciation?  Call me crazy, but don’t you think if scientific evidence overwhelmingly supported creationism, there might be a bit more unanimity on these fundamental questions?

As a young age creationist, let me take this opportunity to follow my own advice and publicly express my ignorance.  If creationism is true, why can we see starlight from stars millions of light years away?  I don’t know.  If creationism is true, what does radiometric dating mean?  I don’t know.  If creationism is true, why do humans and chimpanzees have nearly identical genomes?  I don’t know.  Just like evolutionary creationists wrestling with theological issues, though, young-age creationists have proposed all sorts of answers to the above questions.  Some weren’t very good ideas, but others are quite intriguing.  And just like evolutionary approaches to theology, there is no single creationist scientific model that most creationists would accept.

So we don’t know.  That’s the real bottom line of this whole debate.  If we choose to accept the evolutionary model of origins, it’s not clear how or even whether we can retain a truly Christian theology.  If we choose to go with a creationist-type position, then we’re left with a myriad of unanswered scientific questions.  Either way we go, we don’t have all the answers.  Either way we go, we’re left with intellectual and spiritual tensions.

How can this confession of ignorance ever hope to resolve the deadlock over science and theology?  If you’re looking for one side (yours) to prevail over the others, then confessing ignorance is a guarantee of defeat.  In an intellectual battle, you’ve got to have answers, right?  Admitting that we don’t have answers just makes us look weak.  Opponents will never concede that we’re right if can’t answer their questions!

Maybe that’s the point.  Recall that the Apostles argued amongst themselves about which was the greatest.  Undoubtedly, part of that argument must have entailed which Apostle had the most theologically correct understanding of Jesus’ teachings.  What was Jesus’ response?  He got up and began washing their feet, just like a slave would do.  The time for words was past.  In that final, living parable, Christ showed us what it is to be great.  Those who exalt themselves will be humbled, but those who humble themselves will be exalted.  To be great, become the slave of all.

When it comes to the origins fight, maybe the key is to follow Christ’s example.  Maybe the only way we’ll ever resolve the war is through surrender.  Maybe in surrender, we’ll find out what real victory is.  Maybe we’ll find that confessing ignorance is the first step towards finding God’s truth.  Maybe we’ll discover that asking for wisdom is just what God wanted us to do all along.  Most important of all, maybe we’ll find that we can humbly ask for wisdom together, and in doing so, the world really will see something different about us.

 

Todd Charles Wood is an associate professor of biology and director of the Center for Origins Research at Bryan College. In his spare time, he enjoys classic movies, making pie, and traveling with his wife.

Suggested Posts
Why Some Christian Schools Are Teaching Evolution
October 18, 2017 | Jennifer Vander Molen
Why Some Christian Schools Are Teaching Evolution
One of the reasons Jim Klima sent his son to Front Range Christian School (FRCS) in Littleton, Colorado, is that he knew the school taught that God created the earth in six days. After his son attended a symposium offered by the school where a proponent of evolution explained his views to students, Klima attended a follow-up session later that evening. “We had an interesting discussion over dinner,” he laughed. Why would a Christian school that holds to a young-earth creationist point-of-view invite an evolutionist to address its students? “It’s foundational to who we are,” explained FRCS head of school, David Cooper. “Yes, we’re a young-earth creationist school, but if we’re going create Christian scholars who will be respected and heard, they’ve got to be able to engage in the scientific dialogue with meaningful knowledge. At the same time, we also want our students to learn how to discuss sensitive issues in a way that honors Christ.” To that end, FRCS partnered with us at The Colossian Forum and offered a day-long Symposium on Origins featuring two scientists: Dr. Todd Wood, a young-earth creationist and Dr. Darrel Falk, who believes God used evolution to create the earth. “We want our community to be able to speak their convictions with boldness and courage, but also be able to hold love as part of the process too,” Kevin Taylor, director of the school’s Veritas et Caritas Institute and a Spanish teacher said. “When the world looks at the church, I’d like them to see it appealing because we behave virtuously and civilly in a world so polarized.” Why Teach Evolution? Many Christian schools embrace young-earth creationism, likely for the same reason as Klima: they want an alternative to the evolution that is being taught in public schools. However, when those Christian-school students graduate and head off to college—even to some Christian colleges—they are expected to have at least a rudimentary understanding of evolution. Christian colleges such as Calvin College, Taylor University, Spring Arbor University, Seattle Pacific University, Point Loma Nazarene University, Samford University, and others generally teach from an evolutionary perspective in their science departments, as do virtually all non-religious affiliated colleges and universities. Introducing evolution to Christian-school students is not without its challenges. Head of school Cooper acknowledges resistance from some parents. “We ask them to be patient, to trust us, but I know it’s difficult for some,” he said. Teachers also approach it with mixed feelings. Leslie Bloomquist, who teaches advanced placement biology at FRCS, covers a large unit on evolution with her ninth-graders. “If I didn’t, my students would have a very hard time taking their standardized tests required by the state because there’s just so much evolution on those tests. But I don’t feel real comfortable teaching it.” Though not every state includes questions about evolution on their mandatory student assessments, an increasing number do. In a 2005 questionnaire sent by Education Week to twenty-two states, seventeen reported at least one question on their tests specifically mentioned evolution—some tests had as many as seven questions about evolution. How Do We Have This Conversation? At the FRCS symposium, approximately 250 middle and high-school students listened to Wood and Falk explain their views on origins and then question each other. Students also met in small groups to share their own thoughts on science and faith and interact with the scientists. “There’s definitely disagreement on this topic among the students here,” eleventh-grader Carissa Van Donselaar explained. “This event has helped us learn how to talk about our opinions without fighting each other, and that’s so important because the image that non-believers have of Christians is that we’re always fighting over something.” Both Wood and Falk have been meeting privately for the past three years with The Colossian Forum, putting to test the ministry’s belief that “all things hold together in Christ.” Both believe the other is not only wrong, but harming the church as they promote their respective views of origins. “Todd believes my views could lead students away from faith, while I believe the young-earth creationist view makes it easy for scientists to dismiss the Christian faith altogether, and we really need a Christian presence in the larger scientific community,” Falk explained. “It has not always been easy because, in a way, Darrel Falk is a mortal enemy of creationism,” noted Wood. “In fact, sometimes our discussion gets quite heated, but we’ve been able to have these difficult conversations and still remain friends.” Both credit TCF for providing a God-honoring process for dealing with conflict. “Our role is simply to remind them what they already believe, which is that the gospel is relevant and powerful—especially where there’s conflict,” Michael Gulker, president of TCF, said. “Rather than being a threat to the faith, conflict actually gives us an opportunity to let the gospel work in us and in our culture in ways the culture can no longer imagine. In doing so, we have the opportunity to witness to the reconciling power of the Prince of Peace. It’s great to be able to show the next generation of Christians that it’s possible to contend for what you believe in a way that honors Christ.” How Can We Utilize These Resources? teachFASTly.com is a faith and science teaching resource curated by TCF and Kuyers Institute. Faith and Science Teaching (FAST) helps equip high school teachers to engage big questions around faith and science with confidence and creativity. FAST aims to use the way young people consider these big questions as occasions to press into Christian virtue. The teachFASTly.com site is filled with a large collection of teaching activities, training materials, background essays, book reviews, and more. Where faith and science are so often seen as a source of conflict, FAST creates a space in which teachers and students are invited to engage them as a fruitful opportunity to learn and grow. FAST explores hard questions with integrity, encouraging the very best teaching practices within the context of Christian faithfulness. We hope teachFASTly is a great asset to teach science well in a Christian context.
Being Faithful, Hopeful, Loving People
October 11, 2017 | Michael Gulker
Being Faithful, Hopeful, Loving People
The Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) released a study a few weeks ago on the shifting landscape of religious realities in the United States. What it found isn’t especially surprising: the majority of people in this country are religiously unaffiliated. A few additional highlights: White Christians now account for fewer than half of the public. White evangelical Protestants are in decline—along with white mainline Protestants and white Catholics. America’s youngest religious groups are all non-Christian. Christian circles are filled with many hand-wringing articles, studies, and sermons about how to make your community more accessible and welcoming. Despite the attraction and truth of the gospel, people keep leaving the church. The implications for our culture and society can appear bleak: how can we expect to uphold moral and ethical standards when most people in the U.S. don’t even believe in Jesus? We cry out for solutions. We bemoan and fixate on the challenges facing the church in our society. But the prophet Ezekiel reminds us that we, as the body of Christ, are God’s people and God promises rescue, return, and life from ruin. “I will give them a single heart and I will put a new spirit in them…. Then they shall be my people and I shall be their God” (Ezekiel 11:19-20). Despite what we see in our culture—people leaving the faith, conflict, pride, dissension, protests—there remain faithful shepherds tending to God’s flock. And I’ve had the privilege of walking alongside many of them as they’ve graced us with their involvement in The Colossian Way. In these Colossian Way partners, leaders, coaches, and participants, I see that the faithfulness of shepherds continues to breed life and hope in our world. Certainly, like lost sheep, people still walk away. But God calls back the lost sheep and celebrates their return with a party—a beloved child has come home! Our job is to be faithful, hopeful, loving people along the way—shepherding is a life-long call. We count it sheer joy to play a small role in supporting these faithful shepherds. I pray this gives you hope and reassurance today.