Colossian Blog
November 15, 2012 | Andy Saur

Article – Christian Learning in the Digital Age

Article – Christian Learning in the Digital Age


By Dr. Rick Ostrander, Provost, Cornerstone University
November 15th, 2012

At a recent Board of Trustee meeting at Cornerstone University, our marketing department produced postcards displaying information about the good things going on at the university.  Under the heading “Academic Excellence” was the statement, “All faculty and first-year students have received new MacBooks.”

That claim made me wonder:  Is there a connection between MacBooks and academic excellence?  If so, is it a positive or a negative one?  Or put more broadly, for a Christian university, does technology increase academic quality, or does it threaten real learning?  For all our discussions of faith and science in Christian academia, the more practical question of technology and education may be one of the most important for those of us committed to forming the next generation of believers.

[div id=”callout-left”]True education, in a Christian context, is about effecting a transformation of the learner, not just transmitting information or career skills.[end-div]I had both the impetus and the opportunity to explore this important question over the past few months.  Our university switched from PCs to Apple computers, and as a result our leadership team was invited to spend a day at Apple’s headquarters in Cupertino, California to experience firsthand the wonders of Apple technology.  To prepare for such an event, I perused the recent literature on the disruptive innovations that digital technology is creating for higher education.  That literature spans the spectrum from celebration to lament.

For example, Cathy Davidson, author of Now You See It: How the Brain Science of Attention Will Transform the Way We Live, Work, and Learn, claims that rigid classrooms, one-way lectures, and multiple choice exams are making way for new forms of open-ended collaborative learning that are better adapted to today’s easily-distracted, internet-nurtured brains that constantly flit from one topic to the next.  For her class at Duke University, Davidson gave her students iPods so they could record lectures and listen to them while jogging or riding the bus.  Students decided on what topics the class should study and even ways to grade each other’s work.

Far less sanguine about these changes is Andrew Delbanco, author of College: What It Was, Is, and Should Be.  Delbanco recognizes the value of new technology for online learning in areas in which there is a single right answer, but he questions their value in advancing “genuinely humanistic education.” (5) We have not yet, he observes, found a low-cost alternate to expert human teachers.

Of course, Apple itself is marching confidently toward this digital future.  As Apple officials informed our group, Apple has always sought to humanize technology in order to empower the individual consumer.  They did that first with computers, developing a personal computer that could be put in the hands of the everyday person.  Later they disrupted the music industry by empowering the individual listener to pick and choose what songs to buy on iTunes. Now Apple plans to transform education by empowering individuals to take greater control of their learning through technology.  As our hosts explained, learning occurs best when there’s collaboration, engagement, and exploration.  And those are the qualities that Apple technology provides.[div id=”callout-right”]…digital technology is less effective when it is called upon to create relationships rather than enhance them.[end-div]

So what’s a Christian educator to do amid such portentous changes?  How do we use technology without being used by technology?  As an academic leader and a Christian deeply concerned about nurturing the next generation of believers, I offer a few thoughts on the subject.

True education, in a Christian context, is about effecting a transformation of the learner, not just transmitting information or career skills.  As such, learning cannot be separated from personal relationships.  We learn primarily not from books, lectures, or videos, but from personal encounters with individuals in the discipline who have studied the subject in-depth and have wrestled with its complex questions and possible implications.

And in relational environments, technology can serve a helpful facilitating role.  My wife and I have developed our relationship over twenty-five years of marriage.  Technology helps us maintain and build that relationship.  We text and email each other often, and our texts often contain inside jokes and allusions that would be meaningless to an outsider.

Social networking fulfills a similar role in facilitating and strengthening existing relationships.  When my son spent a semester in Rwanda as a college student, Facebook updates were the best way—in fact the only way—for us to keep in touch with him.  I recently spent a week traveling by myself in China and Korea to visit other universities.  While sitting in the airport waiting to return home, it was comforting to scroll through my friends’ feeds on Facebook and be reminded of the web of personal relationships which I inhabit.

When it comes to education, digital technology can serve a similar purpose in strengthening and facilitating the communal learning process.  After a particularly lively discussion in class, I can follow up with an email on Blackboard that keeps the conversation going.  The class can use the social network to create study groups and share ideas on the assignments.  A professor can develop an online course for his or her students to take over the summer to keep making progress toward their degree.  These are just some of the valuable ways that technology can strengthen the learning process.[div id=”callout-left”]It would be difficult to envision Jesus carrying on his teaching ministry to his disciples apart from real, physical interactions.[end-div]

But digital technology is less effective when it is called upon to create relationships rather than enhance them.  Virtual interactions, if permanently divorced from real relationships, tend to be shallow and superficial, if not downright creepy.  Commercials for online dating services show happy couples cuddling together, not chatting online.

Similarly, an online course that is called upon to create the learning process rather than enhance it may be stretched beyond its capacity.  A course that exists solely among strangers may produce students who can pass an exam, but I question the extent to which such a course can nurture deeper qualities such as curiosity and critical thinking.  I can put my Reformation history lectures online; but it would be difficult for me to convey my passion for studying the Reformation apart from a real face-to-face relationship and dialogue with my students.

A few years ago I sat in a meeting in which an advocate of online courses remarked that we traditionalists needed to get over our “corporeal fetish”—by which he seemed to mean that we were too preoccupied with the physical body.  My reading of Scripture, however, seems to indicate that Jesus shared the same preoccupation.  He took on a real body, held children, rubbed spit in lepers’ eyes, and washed his disciples’ feet.  It would be difficult to envision Jesus carrying on his teaching ministry to his disciples apart from real, physical interactions.  I doubt that an online rendition of the Sermon on the Mount would have the same effect.

Ironically, the icon of the digital age, Steve Jobs, also valued real relationships over virtual ones.  As his biographer Walter Isaacson recounts, Jobs believed that real creativity arose out of face-to-face meetings and from the spontaneous discussions that occurred when people work in physical proximity to each other.  He even designed Apple’s headquarters to ensure that people from various units would run into each other randomly when eating, checking mail, or even going to the bathroom.  I would hope that as Christian educators adopt Jobs’s elegant devices, we also heed his advice about the primacy of personal interactions in producing the kind of deep learning that should characterize our universities.


Rick Ostrander (Ph.D., History, University of Notre Dame) is Provost of Cornerstone University in Grand Rapids, Michigan.  He has written extensively in the areas of American religious history and education, and is currently exploring the challenges of Christian higher education in modern culture. 


Suggested Posts
Why Some Christian Schools Are Teaching Evolution
October 18, 2017 | Jennifer Vander Molen
Why Some Christian Schools Are Teaching Evolution
One of the reasons Jim Klima sent his son to Front Range Christian School (FRCS) in Littleton, Colorado, is that he knew the school taught that God created the earth in six days. After his son attended a symposium offered by the school where a proponent of evolution explained his views to students, Klima attended a follow-up session later that evening. “We had an interesting discussion over dinner,” he laughed. Why would a Christian school that holds to a young-earth creationist point-of-view invite an evolutionist to address its students? “It’s foundational to who we are,” explained FRCS head of school, David Cooper. “Yes, we’re a young-earth creationist school, but if we’re going create Christian scholars who will be respected and heard, they’ve got to be able to engage in the scientific dialogue with meaningful knowledge. At the same time, we also want our students to learn how to discuss sensitive issues in a way that honors Christ.” To that end, FRCS partnered with us at The Colossian Forum and offered a day-long Symposium on Origins featuring two scientists: Dr. Todd Wood, a young-earth creationist and Dr. Darrel Falk, who believes God used evolution to create the earth. “We want our community to be able to speak their convictions with boldness and courage, but also be able to hold love as part of the process too,” Kevin Taylor, director of the school’s Veritas et Caritas Institute and a Spanish teacher said. “When the world looks at the church, I’d like them to see it appealing because we behave virtuously and civilly in a world so polarized.” Why Teach Evolution? Many Christian schools embrace young-earth creationism, likely for the same reason as Klima: they want an alternative to the evolution that is being taught in public schools. However, when those Christian-school students graduate and head off to college—even to some Christian colleges—they are expected to have at least a rudimentary understanding of evolution. Christian colleges such as Calvin College, Taylor University, Spring Arbor University, Seattle Pacific University, Point Loma Nazarene University, Samford University, and others generally teach from an evolutionary perspective in their science departments, as do virtually all non-religious affiliated colleges and universities. Introducing evolution to Christian-school students is not without its challenges. Head of school Cooper acknowledges resistance from some parents. “We ask them to be patient, to trust us, but I know it’s difficult for some,” he said. Teachers also approach it with mixed feelings. Leslie Bloomquist, who teaches advanced placement biology at FRCS, covers a large unit on evolution with her ninth-graders. “If I didn’t, my students would have a very hard time taking their standardized tests required by the state because there’s just so much evolution on those tests. But I don’t feel real comfortable teaching it.” Though not every state includes questions about evolution on their mandatory student assessments, an increasing number do. In a 2005 questionnaire sent by Education Week to twenty-two states, seventeen reported at least one question on their tests specifically mentioned evolution—some tests had as many as seven questions about evolution. How Do We Have This Conversation? At the FRCS symposium, approximately 250 middle and high-school students listened to Wood and Falk explain their views on origins and then question each other. Students also met in small groups to share their own thoughts on science and faith and interact with the scientists. “There’s definitely disagreement on this topic among the students here,” eleventh-grader Carissa Van Donselaar explained. “This event has helped us learn how to talk about our opinions without fighting each other, and that’s so important because the image that non-believers have of Christians is that we’re always fighting over something.” Both Wood and Falk have been meeting privately for the past three years with The Colossian Forum, putting to test the ministry’s belief that “all things hold together in Christ.” Both believe the other is not only wrong, but harming the church as they promote their respective views of origins. “Todd believes my views could lead students away from faith, while I believe the young-earth creationist view makes it easy for scientists to dismiss the Christian faith altogether, and we really need a Christian presence in the larger scientific community,” Falk explained. “It has not always been easy because, in a way, Darrel Falk is a mortal enemy of creationism,” noted Wood. “In fact, sometimes our discussion gets quite heated, but we’ve been able to have these difficult conversations and still remain friends.” Both credit TCF for providing a God-honoring process for dealing with conflict. “Our role is simply to remind them what they already believe, which is that the gospel is relevant and powerful—especially where there’s conflict,” Michael Gulker, president of TCF, said. “Rather than being a threat to the faith, conflict actually gives us an opportunity to let the gospel work in us and in our culture in ways the culture can no longer imagine. In doing so, we have the opportunity to witness to the reconciling power of the Prince of Peace. It’s great to be able to show the next generation of Christians that it’s possible to contend for what you believe in a way that honors Christ.” How Can We Utilize These Resources? is a faith and science teaching resource curated by TCF and Kuyers Institute. Faith and Science Teaching (FAST) helps equip high school teachers to engage big questions around faith and science with confidence and creativity. FAST aims to use the way young people consider these big questions as occasions to press into Christian virtue. The site is filled with a large collection of teaching activities, training materials, background essays, book reviews, and more. Where faith and science are so often seen as a source of conflict, FAST creates a space in which teachers and students are invited to engage them as a fruitful opportunity to learn and grow. FAST explores hard questions with integrity, encouraging the very best teaching practices within the context of Christian faithfulness. We hope teachFASTly is a great asset to teach science well in a Christian context.
Being Faithful, Hopeful, Loving People
October 11, 2017 | Michael Gulker
Being Faithful, Hopeful, Loving People
The Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) released a study a few weeks ago on the shifting landscape of religious realities in the United States. What it found isn’t especially surprising: the majority of people in this country are religiously unaffiliated. A few additional highlights: White Christians now account for fewer than half of the public. White evangelical Protestants are in decline—along with white mainline Protestants and white Catholics. America’s youngest religious groups are all non-Christian. Christian circles are filled with many hand-wringing articles, studies, and sermons about how to make your community more accessible and welcoming. Despite the attraction and truth of the gospel, people keep leaving the church. The implications for our culture and society can appear bleak: how can we expect to uphold moral and ethical standards when most people in the U.S. don’t even believe in Jesus? We cry out for solutions. We bemoan and fixate on the challenges facing the church in our society. But the prophet Ezekiel reminds us that we, as the body of Christ, are God’s people and God promises rescue, return, and life from ruin. “I will give them a single heart and I will put a new spirit in them…. Then they shall be my people and I shall be their God” (Ezekiel 11:19-20). Despite what we see in our culture—people leaving the faith, conflict, pride, dissension, protests—there remain faithful shepherds tending to God’s flock. And I’ve had the privilege of walking alongside many of them as they’ve graced us with their involvement in The Colossian Way. In these Colossian Way partners, leaders, coaches, and participants, I see that the faithfulness of shepherds continues to breed life and hope in our world. Certainly, like lost sheep, people still walk away. But God calls back the lost sheep and celebrates their return with a party—a beloved child has come home! Our job is to be faithful, hopeful, loving people along the way—shepherding is a life-long call. We count it sheer joy to play a small role in supporting these faithful shepherds. I pray this gives you hope and reassurance today.