X

The Colossian Forum Subscription Form

Subscriber Information






Subscriptions

Resources

The Colossian Forum offers free resources to help you transform polarizing cultural conflicts into opportunities for spiritual growth and witness.

Mailing Address







Please enter the required value for your country.

Colossian Blog
November 9, 2011 | Andy Saur

Article – What I Would Like to Hear an Evolutionary Creationist Say

Article – What I Would Like to Hear an Evolutionary Creationist Say

By Todd Charles Wood
November 9th, 2011     

***See the companion article: “What I Would Like To Hear A Young-Earth Creationist Say” by Dennis Venema

If the world is supposed to know we are Christians because of our love for each other, then they’d never guess it when we talk about science and evolution.  I’ve been involved in this debate for almost my entire adult life, and I’ve seen a lot of disheartening behavior that is anything but loving.  As a young person I joined right in on the culture war, but as I’ve matured it seems either the debate has gotten more rancorous or I’ve just grown weary of the fighting.  Maybe it’s a little of both.  Whatever the reason, I’ve become interested in the past few years in ways of breaking the deadlock between the various factions in the war.  The challenge is how to do this?

Then out of the blue, I was invited to contribute something to the Colossian Forum, which I’d never heard of.  As I browsed their website, I sympathized with their stated goals, but my battle weariness made me suspicious of them.  When they suggested I write an essay on “What I would like to hear a theistic evolutionist say,” I couldn’t resist, because I knew exactly what I wanted to hear.  It’s the same thing I want to hear all sides of the debate confess.  It’s what I keep telling my students.  I suspect it might be the key to breaking the deadlock.

I don’t know.

You see, when I look across the battlefield, there’s one thing I see time and time again: Everyone acts as though their position is the only permissible one.  Everyone thinks they’ve got the right theological answers, and everyone thinks they’ve got the right scientific answers.  And of course, each side claims that they’ve got the only rational position.  But is this really true?

When I read over books and articles written by Christians who accept evolution, I notice two important trends.  One trend is the assurance that the scientific debate is settled and certain and more importantly that there is no contradiction between evolution and Christian theology.  This trend reflects that desire to have the answers and to put the best arguments forward.  The second trend is more subtle, and it’s unlikely to be noticed by reading a single author.  Let’s call the second trend theological disparity.

From this outsider’s perspective, it seems like there really is no unified theological position that all evolutionary creationists agree on.  In fact, they don’t even agree on what to call themselves.  Some prefer the newer “evolutionary creationist,” in order to emphasize their belief in God as a Creator God.  Others dislike the connotations of “creationist” and prefer the older term “theistic evolutionist.”  And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Can an evolutionary creationist (or theistic evolutionist, if you prefer) accept a literal Adam and Eve?  If so, how?  Was there a real fall from some perfect state?  If so, how did the fall work?  If not, what does it mean for redemption, both in this life and the one to come?  Tinkering around with the meaning of redemption then strikes at the core of Christianity.  Why did Jesus have to die?  What is the meaning of His resurrection?

Now it’s true that there are answers to all these questions.  Theistic evolutionists don’t shy away from hard questions, but the key point is that there is no agreed-upon answer to any of them.  One person insists that Adam and Eve and a real fall from perfection are not negotiable.  Another wants to keep Adam and Eve but is willing to rethink what the origin of sin might be.  Another thinks that Adam and Eve can be purely symbolic, but still thinks that the fall is real.  Most conservatives in the debate approach the issue of redemption with great care, but there are plenty of others who are quite willing to “reimagine” what Christ’s death and resurrection were all about.

Yet, despite this theological disparity, we are assured that there is no contradiction between Christian theology and evolution.  Call me crazy, but don’t you think if evolution and Christianity were so obviously and easily compatible, there might be a bit more unanimity on how that compatibility actually works?  Am I expecting too much?  Perhaps when people ask if Christian theology is compatible with evolution, the first answer should be, “I don’t know.”

To be fair, what I’ve just written could also be said about young-age creationists and science.  If it’s true that evolution is so obviously wrong and all the evidence supports creationism, why is there such a fight within creationism over cosmogony, Flood geology, created kinds, and speciation?  Call me crazy, but don’t you think if scientific evidence overwhelmingly supported creationism, there might be a bit more unanimity on these fundamental questions?

As a young age creationist, let me take this opportunity to follow my own advice and publicly express my ignorance.  If creationism is true, why can we see starlight from stars millions of light years away?  I don’t know.  If creationism is true, what does radiometric dating mean?  I don’t know.  If creationism is true, why do humans and chimpanzees have nearly identical genomes?  I don’t know.  Just like evolutionary creationists wrestling with theological issues, though, young-age creationists have proposed all sorts of answers to the above questions.  Some weren’t very good ideas, but others are quite intriguing.  And just like evolutionary approaches to theology, there is no single creationist scientific model that most creationists would accept.

So we don’t know.  That’s the real bottom line of this whole debate.  If we choose to accept the evolutionary model of origins, it’s not clear how or even whether we can retain a truly Christian theology.  If we choose to go with a creationist-type position, then we’re left with a myriad of unanswered scientific questions.  Either way we go, we don’t have all the answers.  Either way we go, we’re left with intellectual and spiritual tensions.

How can this confession of ignorance ever hope to resolve the deadlock over science and theology?  If you’re looking for one side (yours) to prevail over the others, then confessing ignorance is a guarantee of defeat.  In an intellectual battle, you’ve got to have answers, right?  Admitting that we don’t have answers just makes us look weak.  Opponents will never concede that we’re right if can’t answer their questions!

Maybe that’s the point.  Recall that the Apostles argued amongst themselves about which was the greatest.  Undoubtedly, part of that argument must have entailed which Apostle had the most theologically correct understanding of Jesus’ teachings.  What was Jesus’ response?  He got up and began washing their feet, just like a slave would do.  The time for words was past.  In that final, living parable, Christ showed us what it is to be great.  Those who exalt themselves will be humbled, but those who humble themselves will be exalted.  To be great, become the slave of all.

When it comes to the origins fight, maybe the key is to follow Christ’s example.  Maybe the only way we’ll ever resolve the war is through surrender.  Maybe in surrender, we’ll find out what real victory is.  Maybe we’ll find that confessing ignorance is the first step towards finding God’s truth.  Maybe we’ll discover that asking for wisdom is just what God wanted us to do all along.  Most important of all, maybe we’ll find that we can humbly ask for wisdom together, and in doing so, the world really will see something different about us.

 

Todd Charles Wood is an associate professor of biology and director of the Center for Origins Research at Bryan College. In his spare time, he enjoys classic movies, making pie, and traveling with his wife.

Suggested Posts
Recovering Our (Theological) Imagination: A Call to Hope
July 25, 2018 | Michael Gulker
Recovering Our (Theological) Imagination: A Call to Hope
My work provides me near-daily occasion to interact with thoughtful, passionate, and culturally engaged Christians. Whether I’m talking with pastors or leaders regarding concrete relational challenges generated by our political climate, wrestling with scholars or public intellectuals on more abstract questions of engaging post-Christian culture faithfully, or just executing the quotidian tasks of The Colossian Forum with my rather extraordinary co-workers, I’m perpetually immersed in fascinating questions of how to authentically live out our faith in today’s culture.    Yet, there’s a shadow side to this work. Despite their energetic engagement with culture, many folks with whom I interact are plagued by doubt and fear. And despite enthusiastic involvement with The Colossian Forum, some friends candidly share, “You know, ‘all things holding together in Christ’—I’m not feeling it. I’m not seeing it. I’m not sure it’s real.” And they may continue: “I love Jesus, and I love the church, but I’m not sure I belong in the Christian world anymore. I don’t know where I belong.” These comments aren’t from disillusioned youth expressing a faddish critique of religion. Rather, they’re from . . .       ~ mature, long-suffering Christians who hurt because today’s political           and religious divisions cut them off from conversations with those               they love;        ~ parents wrestling with the fear that their kids may leave the faith;       ~ pastors questioning whether or not the church really is the body of             Christ given all the senseless polemics ripping their congregation or           denomination apart; and       ~ young people pondering their identification with religious                             institutions that mirror the secular culture.  As theologian Rich Mouw aptly remarked in a recent conversation, “Zombie movies and dystopian future flicks seem more pertinent to life than the Gospel.” We’re woefully short on hope these days. The future feels dark. What do we make of this? And what do we have to show for all our effort to pass on the faith to those we love? Scripture exhorts us to “give reason for the hope that is within us (1 Peter 3:15),” yet we are short on hope.   Hope doesn’t exist in isolation. It’s not an act of will. Nor is it merely an optimistic view of the future, the fruit of a cheery disposition. Instead, our shared hope ought to be the natural outcome of our faith in what Christ accomplished for us in the past. Christ’s life, death, and resurrection reveal the depth and power of God’s love—a love that overcomes every barrier between heaven and earth, you and me, and the ultimate obstacles of sin and death. By faith, this reality gives us hope. While we were yet sinners (and, as such, enemies of God) Christ died for us. This is our reason to hope.    And because of this hope, rooted in God’s faithfulness, we are freed from sin and the fear of death. We are freed to love others sacrificially, as Christ. “Now these three things remain: faith, hope, and love. But the greatest of these is love.” (1 Corinthians 13:13)    Given this heritage of sacrificial love, why do we lose hope? Let me try out an idea on you, and I’d love to hear your reaction.    We’re called to imitate Jesus’ self-giving love. We’re called to pick up our cross and follow his example by loving our enemies. What if we don’t? What if we refuse? What if we’ve lost our theological imagination for imitating Christ’s sacrificial love? What if we’ve forgotten all the practical ways we could embody self-giving love in our culture?   Could it be that our failure of hope—to be a hopeful people—is related to a failure of theological imagination? Perhaps it is a failure of practical wisdom on how to embody hope. Or, even worse, a stark refusal to love sacrificially, especially across political and cultural disagreements.   While we were yet sinners—while we were yet Republicans or Democrats—Christ died for us.    Will we avoid risk and love only those who agree with us?    This is what FOX and CNN offer us. If we lose our theological imagination we will imitate the broader culture by erecting barriers that Christ has already demolished. If we erroneously believe that ideological agreement is the condition for fellowship, then despair and division will be our heritage.   Hope is rooted in God’s faithfulness revealed through Christ’s sacrificial love. How will others experience resurrection hope if we don’t follow Christ by shouldering our cross and loving others sacrificially?   I welcome your thoughts around this topic of deep division, sacrificial love, and our longing for hope. I look forward to engaging with your responses in the upcoming part two of my musings on hope in a divided world.
Giving Testimony to Our Unity in Christ
June 29, 2018 | Michael Gulker
Giving Testimony to Our Unity in Christ
Just as the fall football season launches, we at The Colossian Forum will be hosting our first annual conference at the Haworth Conference Center in Holland, MI, September 20-22. Can a theologically rich conference compete with our national obsession? We believe It can, especially when its theme—Moving from Fear to Hope—addresses the mounting cynicism and despair within our shared public life, overflowing into our closest relationships and faith communities. Scripture speaks of “the hope we have within us” (I Peter 3:15), but at times hope’s pulse is faint amid cultural wrangling and confusion and difficult personal interactions.  So, let’s stir up the hope within us. We invite you to join us for two days as we engage together in the practices of our faith that fuel hope and enable us as Christians to live beautifully and faithfully together. Let’s rediscover a simpler, more profound, discipleship that recreates a Spirit-empowered community that acts like Jesus in the face of post-Christian complexity and conflict. Consider the following reasons to attend our Colossian Forum Conference in September. Grow a deeper understanding of “conflict as opportunity for spiritual growth and witness” Discover a fresh approach for engaging divisive issues within your church or faith community Learn practical skills from others following this new mode of discipleship Engage in joint worship that returns you to the heart of the gospel Renew your vision of hope—a vision built on Jesus Christ alone Take part in a two-hour Politics Forum, where Christian thought leaders will guide our reflections on current political divisions Perhaps the most compelling reason to attend is the conviction that, as believers, we must be of all things, “reconciling people.” Stanley Hauerwas says it so well:  “That conflict is part and parcel of Christian unity means that the unity of the church is not a unity based on agreements, but rather one that assumes disagreements should not lead to division but rather should be a testimony to the existence of a reconciling people.”* While September 20th seems a summer away, our early registration discount will disappear, June 30th.  Venue size limits attendance, so we encourage you to commit now before seasonal activities intervene. Register now for a discounted $125 fee for this two-day experience that includes four meals and an opening reception. Student discounts (50%)  and scholarships are available. Our speaker lineup—including workshop presenters—is not to be missed.  Dr. Richard Mouw, President Emeritus of Fuller Seminary will be both speaking from his personal commitment to pursue peace and the unity we have in Christ. Dr. Mouw emphasizes the “spirituality” that must undergird our efforts toward unity—spiritual traits such as empathy, curiosity, teachability, and humility. How we cultivate these traits through Christian practices is a significant focus of content provided by our gifted cadre of speakers:  Jenell Paris, Messiah College; Mwenda Ntarangwi, Nairobi, Kenya; Michael Gulker and Rob Barrett, The Colossian Forum.  Workshop presenters include Rebecca DeYoung, Calvin College; James Calvin Davis, Middlebury College;  Chris DeVos, The Colossian Forum; Joe Liechty, Goshen College; Trisha Taylor, Counselor; Parisa Parsa, Essential Partners.   Centered strategically within the conference is our Public Forum, Political Division: Moving Toward Hope held nearby at 14th Street Christian Reformed Church. For two hours, the public will join us for this timely conversation.                         You will enjoy Michigan in the fall. Haworth Conference Center is on the campus of Hope College and within a winning football pass to fantastic dining and shopping in Downtown Holland. If you need lodging, we’ve arranged special rates at three local hotels, including Haworth. We look forward to welcoming you in September! Questions? Please email or call  616-328-6016.  * Hauerwas, Approaching the End, p109, as quoted in Forbearance by James Calvin Davis, p17